Resources
“I have not failed. I’ve just found 10,000 ways that won’t work.” -Thomas Edison
We all need support at times. The resources below will help you connect with your community and find ways to make a positive difference.
Global Resources
African Centre for Cities (ACC)- based in Cape Town, researches urbanization in Africa and promotes sustainable planning models.
Asian Development Bank – Urban Development Invests in urban infrastructure and smart city initiatives across Asia, with a focus on inclusive growth.
C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group- Unites 100+ cities to tackle climate change through urban planning, clean energy, and transportation reform.
Cities Alliance- Supports city development in low-income countries, focusing on slum upgrading, inclusive planning, and local governance.
ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability- Helps cities implement sustainability strategies across energy, transport, biodiversity, and climate adaptation.
Inter-American Development Bank – Urban Development- Supports Latin American cities with funding and technical assistance for urban resilience and mobility.
ISOCARP (International Society of City and Regional Planners)- Connects planners worldwide to advance inclusive, resilient, and sustainable cities. Hosts the World Planning Congress and publishes global best practices.
Lincoln Institute of Land Policy- Provides research and training on land use, taxation, and equitable urban development.
Manchester Urban Institute (MUI)- Academic hub for urban research, focusing on governance, infrastructure, and social equity.
Shack/Slum Dwellers International (SDI)- Empowers informal settlement communities to co-create planning solutions with local governments.
OECD – Urban Policy Division- Develops policy frameworks for smart cities, housing, and regional development across member countries.
UN-Habitat- Promote sustainable urban development and adequate shelter for all. Leads initiatives like the Global Network of Urban Planning and Design Labs to support cities with planning, finance, and legal frameworks.
World Bank – Urban Development Division- Funds infrastructure and planning projects to reduce poverty and improve urban services in developing countries.
Federal Resources
(Departments) A-Z index of U.S. government departments and agencies
(Census Data)United States Census Bureau
(Development Codes) International Code Council
California Resources
California Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs)
| MPO | Counties Covered | Objective | Incorporated Cities | Website |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMBAG | Monterey, San Benito, Santa Cruz | Regional planning for transportation, housing, and climate. | Monterey, Salinas, Santa Cruz, Watsonville, Hollister, Seaside, Marina, Capitola | ambag.org |
| BCAG | Butte | Transportation planning, air quality, and transit. | Chico, Oroville, Gridley, Biggs, Paradise | bcag.org |
| Fresno COG | Fresno | Transportation and land use planning. | Fresno, Clovis, Coalinga, Sanger, Selma, Reedley, Kerman, Kingsburg | fresnocog.org |
| Kern COG | Kern | Regional transportation, housing, and air quality. | Bakersfield, Delano, Ridgecrest, Wasco, Arvin, Tehachapi, Shafter | kerncog.org |
| KCAG | Kings | Transportation and transit planning. | Hanford, Lemoore, Corcoran, Avenal | kcag.org |
| MCTC | Madera | Transportation planning and funding. | Madera, Chowchilla | maderactc.org |
| MCAG | Merced | Transportation and housing planning. | Merced, Atwater, Los Banos, Livingston, Gustine, Dos Palos | mcagov.org |
| MTC/ABAG | Bay Area (9 counties) | Transportation, housing, and climate resilience. | San Francisco, Oakland, San Jose, Berkeley, Fremont, Richmond, Vallejo, and 90+ others | mtc.ca.gov |
| SACOG | Sacramento, Yolo, Yuba, Sutter, El Dorado (partial), Placer (partial) | Transportation, housing, and economic development planning. | Sacramento, West Sacramento, Davis, Roseville, Folsom, Elk Grove, Woodland, Marysville | sacog.org |
| SANDAG | San Diego | Transportation, housing, and climate planning. | San Diego, Chula Vista, Oceanside, Escondido, Carlsbad, El Cajon, National City | sandag.org |
| SJCOG | San Joaquin | Smart growth and transportation planning. | Stockton, Lodi, Manteca, Tracy, Lathrop, Ripon, Escalon | sjcog.org |
| SLOCOG | San Luis Obispo | Transportation and land use planning. | San Luis Obispo, Paso Robles, Atascadero, Morro Bay, Pismo Beach, Grover Beach, Arroyo Grande | slocog.org |
| SBCAG | Santa Barbara | Transportation and regional planning. | Santa Barbara, Santa Maria, Lompoc, Goleta, Carpinteria, Buellton, Solvang, Guadalupe | sbcag.org |
| SRTA | Shasta | Transportation planning and funding. | Redding, Anderson, Shasta Lake | srta.ca.gov |
| SCAG | Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, Ventura | Regional planning for transportation, housing, and climate. | Los Angeles, Anaheim, Riverside, Long Beach, Santa Ana, San Bernardino, Oxnard, and 190+ others | scag.ca.gov |
| StanCOG | Stanislaus | Regional transportation and housing planning. | Modesto, Turlock, Ceres, Riverbank, Oakdale, Patterson, Hughson, Waterford, Newman | stancog.org |
| TMPO | El Dorado (partial), Placer (partial) | Transportation and environmental planning in the Tahoe Basin. | South Lake Tahoe, Tahoe City, Kings Beach | trpa.gov/mpo |
| TCAG | Tulare | Transportation and regional planning. | Visalia, Tulare, Porterville, Dinuba, Lindsay, Exeter, Farmersville, Woodlake | tularecog.org |
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Overview of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), https://www.epa.gov/nepa
NEPA.GOV, Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) Handbook on NEPA, https://ceq.doe.gov/publications/NEPA-CEQA_Handbook.html
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
California EPA, https://calepa.ca.gov/
California Environmental Reporting System (CERS), https://cers.calepa.ca.gov/
Governor's Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation https://www.lci.ca.gov/
Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation, “Getting Started with CEQA,” Website to outline the steps in the CEQA review. https://lci.ca.gov/ceqa/getting-started/
| Aspect | CEQA | NEPA |
|---|---|---|
| Enabling Statute & Jurisdiction | California Environmental Quality Act (1970). Applies to discretionary projects by California public agencies. | National Environmental Policy Act (1969). Applies to “major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.” |
| Trigger | Any project undertaken or requiring approval by a California public agency, unless statutorily or categorically exempt. | Federal permits, funding, or land-management actions that may have significant environmental impacts. |
| Lead Agency | The California public agency has principal authority over the project. | The Federal agency proposing, funding, or authorizing the action. |
| Exemptions & Exclusions | Statutory exemptions (e.g., emergency repairs), categorical exemptions under CEQA Guidelines, and ministerial projects. | Categorical exclusions per agency NEPA regulations, functional exemptions, and extraordinary circumstances may require an EA. |
| Core Environmental Documents | Initial Study (IS) leading to: • Negative Declaration (ND) • Mitigated ND (MND) • Environmental Impact Report (EIR) | Environmental Assessment (EA) leading to: • Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) • Mitigated FONSI • Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) |
| Process Steps | 1. IS → ND/MND or scoping for EIR 2. Draft EIR → public review 3. Final EIR → Findings & Record of Determination |
1. EA → FONSI (if no significant impact) or scoping for EIS 2. Draft EIS → public review 3. Final EIS → Record of Decision |
| Alternatives Analysis | Required in every EIR; must include a range of reasonable project alternatives. | Central to an EIS; must analyze alternatives and identify the agency’s preferred alternative (if one exists). |
| Public Notice & Comment | Notice of Preparation (NOP) for EIR; Notice of Determination (NOD); 30–45-day comment periods; public hearings optional. | Notice of Intent (NOI) published in the Federal Register; 30- to 45-day comment; agencies often mail notices or use clearinghouses. |
| Decision Document | Findings of Fact & Statement of Overriding Considerations (for significant impacts) plus Notice of Determination. | Record of Decision (ROD), summarizing alternatives considered, adopted mitigation, and the rationale for the chosen action. |
| Timing & Statute of Limitations | No strict CEQA timeline; 30-day statute of limitations on NOD/ND/MND challenges. | No firm deadlines in CEQ regulations; agencies set internal schedules; ROD cannot issue until at least 30 days after Final EIS. |
| Appeals & Enforcement | CEQA is litigated in California courts; the project stays if an injunction is granted. | NEPA compliance is enforced via federal court; injunctive relief may halt a Federal action pending NEPA review. |
| Integration & Joint Documents | Joint EIR/EIS permitted via Memoranda of Understanding; CEQ-OPR NEPA-CEQA Handbook guides coordination. | Encourages integration with state reviews; joint EIR/EIS satisfies both statutes when federal and state approvals overlap. |
| Mitigation Monitoring | Mandatory Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for every EIR. | Monitoring is required when mitigation is adopted in the ROD, but it is less prescriptive than CEQA’s MMRP. |